UNBOXING THE SCIENCE OF RISK

Welcome to Unboxed Thinking. Join our community as we deep-dive into the world of natural disasters and explore the intricacies of data and scientific knowledge. Here, we embrace discussions and different opinions, share insights, and foster a spirit of learning to power our understanding of risk.

Live Feed

Fri 9 May 15:35 GMT
  • Profile Avatar
    Tyler Cox PhD2 months ago

    As winter turns to spring, flowers begin to bloom and seasonal hurricane forecasts are about to be released. There will be a lot of seasonal hurricane predictions coming out in the next few months and almost all of them will rely on the six-month sea surface temperature (SST) forecasts released by national modelling centres. This raises the question, how accurate are these six-month SST forecasts?

    There’s a lot of different ways that we can evaluate how good or bad a forecast is, but one straightforward way is to look at how well it has performed in the past. The plot shows SST forecasts for the Main Development Region of the Atlantic Ocean over the past 18 months, released by ECMWF, a leading modelling centre. By comparing past forecast anomalies (grey lines), released monthly, to observed SST anomalies (yellow line), we can see that the forecasts have correctly predicted the cooling trend in the Main Development Region since June 2024. However, they have often been too aggressive with the cooling (grey forecasts are mostly below the yellow observations).  Looking ahead to the start of hurricane season in June, the forecasts predict continued cooling, which would significantly lower hurricane risk compared to 2024. Whether the latest forecasts (blue line) are accurate remains one of the major questions that organizations releasing seasonal hurricane forecasts will need to grapple with. Inigo will be releasing our view in the coming weeks, so stay tuned!

  • Profile Avatar
    Ludovico Nicotina PhD3 months ago

    AI technology is now ubiquitous, with specialised hardware and software playing crucial roles in the development and deployment of artificial intelligence models. Popular frameworks like TensorFlow and PyTorch run seamlessly on multiple types of hardware and Graphics Processing Units (GPUs) and Tensor Processing Units (TPUs) are extensively employed to solve computational fluid dynamics problems.

    In a recent paper co-authored by Boyang Chen, Amin Nadimy, and colleagues, we demonstrate how convolutional layers commonly used in neural networks can help solve complex partial differential equations. The paper, titled “Solving the Discretised Shallow Water Equations Using Neural Networks“, showcases this innovative approach. The NN4PDEs framework, developed by the Applied Modelling and Computational Group at Imperial College London, enables these use cases. In this method, the convolutional layer provides a discretisation scheme to solve the equations. Though conceptually simple, the paper illustrates the practical implementation for complex equations like the shallow water equations.

    Importantly, these tools can effectively model flood risk with the accuracy and spatial resolution needed to represent local water depth during significant floods. We applied this to simulate the flood event impacting Carlisle, UK, in January 2005. The figure below, from the paper, depicts the problem setup and the solution provided by this approach.

    While this early work demonstrates that the NN4PDEs approach achieves results and computational performances comparable to traditional computational fluid dynamics tools, it also paves the way for further applications. These applications can seamlessly combine AI models and physics on different scales or allow scaling up hardware to solve complex fluid dynamics problems over large domains.

  • Profile Avatar
    Patrick Ball PhD4 months ago

    Wildfire Whiplash – sudden shifts with painful consequences.

    Rapid transitions between wet and dry conditions can increase frequency and severity of natural catastrophes like flash flooding or wildfires. The unprecedented wildfires that have devastated Los Angeles County are, in part, a result of this phenomenon. The figure below shows cumulative precipitation data recorded by a rain gauge in downtown LA since 1907. After two exceptionally wet seasons in 2022/23 and 2023/24 (blue lines), the LA hills experienced an explosion of grass and brush growth. However, since then Los Angeles has endured its second driest June to January on record (red line), desiccating the landscape and creating a highly flammable tinderbox environment. The combination of this abundant fuel, alongside strong winds and ignitions has led to the most destructive wildfire season ever recorded.

    Inigo has established a partnership with climate scientist Daniel Swain (UC ANR & UCLA) to better understand US wildfire seasonality and associated risks. His latest publication on ‘hydroclimactic whiplash’ is extremely timely and an excellent summary of it can be found on his website – Hydroclimate volatility on a warming Earth – Weather West.

  • Profile Avatar
    Patrick Ball PhD5 months ago

    Santa Ana winds intensified the ongoing Franklin fire in Malibu, California, forcing mass evacuations and valiant firefighting efforts. These hot, dry, powerful winds desiccate vegetation, carry embers, and increase flame length, accelerating wildfire spread. From 1990 to 2009, 50% of burned area and 80% of wildfire economic loss in Southern California was linked to Santa Ana winds (Kolden et al., 2018). More recent examples include the 2017 Thomas and 2020 El Dorado fires, which together burned over 300,000 acres.

    Climate change is increasing annual average air temperatures and wildfire burned area across the Western US (NOAA, NIFC), but its impact and Santa Ana winds is uncertain. These winds are generated by pressure gradients between the warm Great Plains and the cooler Pacific Ocean that typically form during the autumn months. Reanalysis of weather data from 1979-2020 reveals that strengthening temperature gradients between coastal California and the continental interior may be increasing the frequency of these events (Thompson et al., 2023). However, global climate model outputs suggest that the frequency of Santa Ana winds may decline over the 21st century as the annual window of favourable conditions narrows (Guzman-Morales and Gershunov, 2020).

    Though the evolution of Santa Ana winds as the climate changes is unclear, their devastating effect on wildfire activity continues to increase. California’s rainy season arrives ~27 days later than it did in 1960 (Lukovic et al., 2021). A extended wait for wildfire-relieving rains prolongs the period where vegetation dried over the summer months is exposed to Santa Ana winds. As a result, we may see an increasing number of late-season Santa-Ana-fuelled fires like the Franklin fire in the future.

    Chart representing monthly precipitation for California and average number of Santa Ana events

    Solid and dashed blue lines show the mean monthly precipitation for California between 1943-1963 and 2010-2023, respectively (National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Association). Yellow bars show the monthly average number of Santa Ana events recorded between 1948 and 2012 (Guzman-Morales et al., 2016).

  • Profile Avatar
    Ludovico Nicotina PhD5 months ago

    Earlier this year on September 27th Asheville, NC was the center of the devastation brought by hurricane Helene, with record-breaking rainfall which resulted in extreme flooding. The flooding inundated homes, businesses, and roads, displacing hundreds of residents and leading to billions of dollars in damages and hundreds of houses destroyed in Buncombe County. With 227 fatalities Helene became the deadliest hurricane to hit the US since Katrina in 2005.

    With one of the longest daily rainfall records in the U.S., dating back to the 1870s, Asheville’s historical data highlights the peculiar nature of this event. The figure shows, for each year in the historical record, the maximum 24-hour (blue) and 72-hours (yellow) rainfall totals. While Helene’s 1-day rainfall (and peak rainfall rate) were significant but not unprecedented and were exceeded at least twice in the historical record, the 3-day total far exceeded anything in Asheville’s history. This record-breaking 3-day rainfall was fuelled by two days of heavy rain before Helene’s arrival, caused by a unique meteorological setup. The precursor rain saturated the ground and raised river levels, leaving the region vulnerable to catastrophic flooding once Helene made landfall.

    This event highlights the growing challenge of preparing for extreme weather. The sequence and intensity of rainfall, rather than daily peaks alone, proved decisive in causing the devastation. At Inigo, we’re prioritizing the evaluation of flood risk models and maximizing our learning from these events to improve our preparedness and resilience in the face of increasingly severe weather patterns. Asheville’s experience underscores the urgency of better understanding flood risk and adapting to a changing climate to mitigate future risks.

    Chart showing the maximum 24-hour and 72-hours rainfall totals for each year in Asheville's historical record

  • Profile Avatar
    Tyler Cox PhD5 months ago

    AI weather forecasting is in the news again this week, with Google DeepMind’s release of GenCast. AI weather models have made rapid progress for forecasts up to 15 days in advance, but less progress has been made on the notoriously difficult problem of seasonal predictions. Accurate seasonal predictions would provide an opportunity for society to prepare well in advance of hazardous conditions.  Here at Inigo we’ve spent the last few months refining our strategy for seasonal hurricane prediction. A major part of that work has been creating I-SPARK (Inigo Seasonal Prediction and Analysis of RisK), a new AI tool to help make accurate seasonal hurricane predictions at insurance relevant lead times of three to nine months.

    I-SPARK uses freely available sea surface temperature forecasts to predict the level of risk for the upcoming hurricane season. The figure shows some of the sea surface temperature regions that the model will be using to make its December initiated forecast in a few weeks time. Interestingly, our model disregards most ENSO information until after spring due to low predictability. As the figure inset shows, the model skill rapidly increases by February, but then falls off in spring. This gives us confidence that useful hurricane risk information can be derived as early as February, but we need to do more work to understand why the model struggles in spring.

    This work is being presented at the American Geophysical Union conference in early December, 2024. You can check out the full conference poster and additional details on GitHub. Please reach out if you want to learn more.

     

    Graphic of December initiated model forecast regions

     

  • Profile Avatar
    Ruth Petrie PhD5 months ago

    The 2024 hurricane season began with the earliest Category 5 hurricane ever recorded. In an unprecedented twist there was an eerily long and unexpected lull during the peak season, before ending with a flurry of activity in the Gulf. Next month, Charles Powell, from the University of Cambridge, and I will be sharing a retrospective of 2024 as part of the work that Inigo is funding under its InSPIRe programme.

    The chart compares the timing of the first and last major hurricanes for the climatological periods 1980-2020, 1980–2000 and 2000–2020 and compares these to 2024. The vertical lines denote the temperature range between the first and last major hurricane and the horizontal line the mean temperature. From the climatological data we can see that there is a fairly well-defined start to the first major hurricane in the season, but that the end of the season appears to be extending, with the last major hurricane occurring later in the 2000–2020 period compared with the earlier 1980–2000 period. The first major hurricane of 2024, Beryl, is a remarkable outlier becoming a major hurricane on the 30th of June. The last major hurricane of 2024, Rafael, reached  major hurricane status on the 6th of November, which, while not unprecedented, is approximately two standard deviations from the long-term mean.

    Our analysis shows that the average temperatures in the Atlantic main development region have increased between the early and later periods, 1980–2000 and 2000–2020, with 2024 being one of the hottest years on record. As global temperatures continue to rise due to climate change, warmer oceans are able to sustain major hurricanes earlier and later in the season potentially leading to extended hurricane seasons This could pose a challenge for the insurance sector, as amplified hurricane risk over a longer season increases the potential for catastrophic loss events.

    Chart showing daily average sea surface temperatures in the Atlantic main development region

  • Profile Avatar
    Tyler Cox PhD8 months ago

    Typhoon Shanshan made landfall in the Kagoshima Prefecture of southern Japan on August 29th bringing considerable flooding and rainfall with it. Some areas broke rainfall records with over 300mm of rain in 24 hours. Early forecasts showed the potential for even more catastrophic outcomes with the storm forecast to make landfall as a powerful typhoon between Osaka and Tokyo, a highly populated area. However, the storm ended up making a sharp turn westward before turning north and making landfall (yellow track on map). The map below shows the forecast tracks for the ECMWF traditional and AI models initialized on August 23rd with the forecast strength of the storm indicated by text in each track point.

    Weather models generally did a poor job forecasting this storm. One of the first models to pick up on the westward turn was the AI model run by ECMWF (blue track), one of the world leaders in weather prediction. In many ways this was a win for the AI models, they accurately forecast the track of a dangerous storm hours and days before traditional weather models (the ECMWF traditional model is the orange track). However, this success came with a massive caveat. The ECMWF AI model forecast the westward turn, but also forecast the storm would never rise above tropical storm strength, a known and recurring issue for AI weather models. In reality, the storm briefly reached category 4 strength, with sustained winds of 215km/h, before weakening to a category 1 storm prior to landfall. All together, Typhoon Shanshan presented an interesting case study in the promise and shortcomings of AI weather models.

     

    Typhoon Shanshan model forecasts on August 23rd

     

     

     

  • Profile Avatar
    Patrick Ball PhD9 months ago

    Inigo Welcomes Patrick Ball to the Climate Science Team.

    “As a Risk Scientist within Inigo’s Catastrophe Research team, my role is to help our underwriters and exposure managers leverage the latest scientific advances and cutting-edge technology when assessing the likelihood and impact of natural disasters to our insurance portfolio. This work includes evaluating and optimising catastrophe models, collaborating with academic institutions and insurtech companies, and performing bespoke research projects. This scientific data-driven approach ensures Inigo stands out from the crowd! While our team covers all natural disasters, my specialty is earthquakes. I hold a masters and PhD in Geophysics from the Universities of Oxford and Cambridge, respectively, and prior to joining Inigo I worked as a researcher at several universities and a catastrophe model vendor”.

  • Profile Avatar
    Climate Science Team2 years ago

    Idalia made landfall as a major hurricane this week in a season where we’ve been anticipating what might become of a Battle Royale between the anomalously warm seas in the Atlantic and an ongoing El Niño in the Pacific. A reminder: we’re not even climatologically half way through the season yet…

    Taking a look at the sea surface temperatures in the Gulf of Mexico, it’s little surprise we saw a strong landfall: in the week leading up to Idalia, the sea in its path was the warmest it’s been in since 1982 (when this particular sea temperature dataset started). The chart here shows the average sea temperature for the period of Aug 23-29th for every year for the past 40 years in the red box shown that broadly straddles the region through which Idalia passed and developed. Naturally other factors will always influence how a storm develops, but you don’t typically get the heavy-hitters of hurricanes without the warmer seas.

    And now for the rest of the season…

    Chart showing the sea surface temperatures in the Gulf of Mexico

  • Profile Avatar
    Ruth Petrie PhD2 years ago

    Lahaina, located on the northwest coast of the Hawaiian island of Maui, experienced a devasting wildfire in August 2023. Several factors likely contributed to the severity of this wildfire including enhancement of strong easterly winds by Hurricane Dora, Katabatic winds flowing from the West Maui Mountains, located to the east of Lahaina, and drought conditions.

    The precipitation rate for all of Hawaii has been extracted from the NCEP Reanalysis data between 1980 and 2023 and is shown in the graph. The precipitation rate for February 2023 was the highest recorded since 1980 at nearly three times the average. Precipitation rates throughout the spring were above average but by June it is below average, with July being extremely dry in the bottom 5% of years.

    The February and spring rainfall likely contributed to a growth of vegetation. During dry seasons an increase in fuel availability contributes to the wildfire risk. Precipitation rates over Hawaii have been well below normal for June and July leading to drought conditions across Hawaii. According to the US Drought Monitor the most severe droughts over Hawaii in South and West Maui (where Lahaina is located). It is likely that the drought conditions combined with an abundance of fuel from the wet February and spring were contributory factors in the severity of the Lahaina wildfire.

    Graph showing Hawaii precipitation rate

  • Profile Avatar
    Climate Science Team2 years ago

    The Copernicus Climate Change Service produces monthly seasonal forecasts from many different weather forecasting centres to help us understand possible future conditions around the globe.

    The chart below shows the expected rainfall through the months of September to November from five different seasonal forecast models. Greens show rainier conditions, brown shows drier conditions. The rainier conditions can be indicative of increased tropical cyclone activity. This year we have an El Nino – that usually weakens hurricane activity – but a warm Atlantic, that can increase activity. So, any indications of what is come in such a difficult year to forecast are always useful.

    It’s interesting to note the green, wetter region across the Tropical Atlantic. However,this region exists more towards the central / eastern Atlantic, which may be indicative of a busier hurricane season here, but this anomalous wetness is reduced towards the eastern seaboard of the US – although rainfall is still expected to be slightly above average here. All to play for with the three key months ahead – but will we be spared hurricane landfalls with a busy tropical season staying over the sea?

Comments
You must Login to post comments, or why not Create an Account

Hurricanes Hub

Hurricanes Hub

Rainfall Extremes in a Changing Climate: Detecting Change and Improving Predictions 

Key Points

  • Global warming increases the probability of intense rainfall events and might impact rainfall associated to tropical cyclones.
  • Detecting trends in historical rainfall records is challenging due to the large variability in rainfall extremes. We’d need to wait a long time before trends emerge, while physics and climate models suggest that these trends exist.
  • Statistical methods that focus on capturing the signal in noisy data and that leverage information from large datasets should be preferred in presence of non-stationarities and to predict future extremes.

Last week I was in Vienna at the annual meeting of the European Geoscience Union (EGU), a large gathering of the wider international academic community, which sees thousands of researchers gather to showcase their work in the wide and disparate fields of geosciences. As always it was a great opportunity to hear the latest research advancements, meet old friends and build new connections. At EGU I presented Inigo’s reflections on extreme rainfall events, and suggested methods for handling extremes in presence of non-stationarities [Nicòtina et al., 2025]. In this article I will cover the motivation that led to investigate rainfall extremes, some details on the data available and their analysis and the main take away.


Why should we focus on trends in rainfall extremes?

Global warming is expected to intensify rainfall extremes due to a warmer, more moisture-rich atmosphere. Yet, proving this in historical data remains challenging. This article discusses why detecting trends in extreme rainfall is challenging, why conventional significance testing may not be sufficient, and how model selection can offer a better tool to describe trends in the presence of physical arguments for their existence. Crucially, recognizing trends in historical rainfall observations helps to build more resilient and up to date views of potential extremes. The future NOAA Atlas 15, the authoritative National Precipitation Frequency Atlas for the United States, will recognize non-stationarity in historical data. Such a methodological advance can improve our capacity to anticipate future extremes and design more resilient infrastructure and risk mitigation strategies; therefore the quantification of the trends becomes a fundamental part of the risk assessment process.

Hurricane Helene and the role of preceding rainfall

On the evening of September 26, 2024, Hurricane Helene made landfall in the Big Bend region of Florida as a Category 4 hurricane. Concurrently, a broad area of extensive and intense precipitation had been affecting the southern Appalachian Mountains since the early hours of September 26. This system persisted through Helene’s landfall and continued until the tropical cyclone’s path reached western North Carolina. The combination of the “Predecessor Rain Event” (PRE) and the tropical rainfall of Helene resulted in sustained widespread precipitation for three consecutive days, particularly in North Carolina making hurricane Helene the deadliest storm to make landfall in the US since Katrina in 2005. Figure 2 shows Helene’s rainfall amount in the historical context through annual maximum daily and 3-day total rainfall amount. The 3-day total registered by the pluviometer in Asheville, NC surpassed 350mm making it by far the highest extreme since records begun in 1878.

Figure 1 – Schematic of Helene’s PRE event (Source: CW3E)

PREs are mesoscale zones of intense rainfall, often forming approximately 1,000 km poleward of recurving tropical cyclones. In this instance, the PRE contributed to catastrophic flooding across eastern Tennessee and western North Carolina. The predecessor event significantly exacerbated flooding, turning what might have been a moderate flood into a catastrophic event. For example, the French Broad River near Fletcher, NC, reached a peak gauge height of 30.31 feet on September 27, exceeding the previous record by over 10 feet [Center for Western Weather and Water Extremes (CW3E), 2024].

Helene’s devastation is a striking reminder that extreme rainfall is not just a meteorological anomaly, but a growing hazard in a warming world. However, separating climate-driven trends from natural variability in rainfall extremes remains a central challenge which leads to significant uncertainty in the estimation of the probability of occurrence of extreme rainfall and flood events.

Figure 2 – Annual maxima 24h (blue) and 72h (yellow) rainfall amounts for the rain gauge in Asheville, NC. (Data: GHCNd, NOAA)

Climate Science Suggests Extremes are Intensifying

A warmer atmosphere can hold more moisture – about 7% more per 1°C rise – leading to heavier rainfall events. This thermodynamic principle underpins projections of increasing precipitation extremes globally. Changes in global weather patterns also impact rainfall extremes through dynamic effects, whose mechanisms are active research topics (e.g. stronger hurricanes produce more updraft which leads to increased rainfall intensity; changes in circulation can also lead to increased likelihood of blocking weather patterns that lead to stationary systems and prolonged rainfall events). Figure 3 shows the global mean temperature anomaly over land and sea, calculated by NOAA in their Global Temperature Index. The anomaly is taken relative to the 1971-2000 average and highlights the strong trends in global temperatures that characterize man-made climate change. In present climate extreme precipitation events are expected to be more extreme than they were pre-1950.

Climate models, from CMIP5/CMIP6 to high-resolution regional simulations, also consistently predict a rise in the frequency and severity of extreme rainfall under continued warming. These models suggest that the upper tail of the rainfall distribution is becoming fatter and shifting rightward. However, these projections must be supported by observational data to validate model accuracy and inform adaptation efforts.

Figure 3 – Global Mean Surface Temperature (GMST) anomaly in the period 1850-2024. The anomaly is relative to the 1970-2000 average temperature. (Source: NCEI NOAA, NOAA Global Temp | National Centers for Environmental Information)

Beyond Significance: Using Model Selection to Detect Trends

To analyze real-world trends, we examined over 40 U.S. stations with long (≥70-year) daily rainfall records with a focus on annual maximum rainfall for 24-hours and 72-hours rainfall accumulations (Figure 4). If we look at trends in the samples through a non-parametric statistical test, the Mann-Kendall test [Papalexiou & Montanari, 2019], with the null hypothesis being the absence of trends, the test assesses whether the null hypothesis can be rejected with a given degree of confidence (e.g. 5% significance level). The results of the Mann-Kendall test showed that for the sites being analyzed about 15 to 20 percent of the sites exhibited a statistically significant trend, according to this test. This result confirms that in most cases it is not possible to establish and quantify trends when faced with noisy data dominated by natural variability even when science suggests these trends should exist. The implication? Traditional statistical significance testing (p-value) may be the wrong tool for the job.

Figure 4 – Location of the sites selected for this analysis throughout the US. Selected stations have at least 70 years of daily rainfall observations and are located in areas where there is a significant flood risk exposure.

When focussing on present day risk a practically more useful question is around how to best model extremes. To achieve this objective, we might interrogate the data from the point of view of identifying the best statistical model that describes the extremes. Since climate science suggests that extremes should depend on global temperature it seems reasonable to ask whether a model that relates rainfall extremes to global mean surface temperature is better at describing the variability of the data compared to one that is not (i.e. stationary model). The Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) is a metric that evaluates the quality of statistical models while penalizing complexity [Jewson et al., 2021] and can support the model selection logic. When comparing two models – one assuming no trend, the other incorporating a linear trend linked to global mean temperature – the model with the lower AIC is preferred.

Figure 5 – Relationship between annual maxima 1-day (top) and 3-days (bottom) rainfall and GMST anomaly. Green line show best fit for a model that assumes linear trend with the GMST covariate (left) and one that assumes no trend (right).

This approach shifts the focus from ‘Is the trend significant?’ to ‘Which model better explains the data?’ Using regression models with and without trends in rainfall extremes (based on global mean temperature anomalies), we found that approximately 40% of sites are better modeled with a trend, compared to only ~20% showing statistically significant trends.

Learning from the Ordinary Values

Traditional Extreme Value Theory (EVT) looks only at block maxima – e.g. the single highest rainfall value per year, if the block size is 365 days – to model the behaviour of the tail in a random process. This has the advantage of not having to make assumptions on the distribution of the process at hand, leveraging theory that relies on the asymptotic behaviour of the extremes regardless of the (unknown) parent distribution.

However, this approach leads to discarding the majority of the observations available for a physical process like rainfall, assuming that they do not contain useful information. As an alternative, the Metastatistical Extreme Values approach [MEV, Marani and Ignaccolo, 2015, Devò et al., 2025], postulates that the distribution of ordinary values contains useful information on the physical processes and their potential non-stationarity which can be leveraged to understand and model the extremes.

Figure 6 – The metastatistical extreme values (MEV) approach applied to the historical daily rainfall observationsh in Asheville, NC. The weibull fit of the annual ordinary values distribution is shown on top, color-coded based on the year. The scale (left) and shape (right) parameters of the weibull distribution are shown in the bottom panels, related to the GMST anomaly.

In the MEV framework the distribution of the ordinary rainfall is assumed to follow a Weibull distribution and one such distribution is fit to each year of observations. Regressing the parameters of the annual fit against global temperatures gives an indication of how the ordinary value distribution has changed over time. The application of the MEV approach to the data for Asheville is shown in Figure 6 and the extension to all the sites studied in this article revealed that approximately 60% of stations show upward trends in the scale parameter when using the MEV approach.

This suggests that while extremes are hard to diagnose due to noise, the underlying distribution is clearly shifting, implying that extremes will be also shifting even if their behaviour might emerge on longer time scale.

Conclusions

In this simple analysis we have focussed on the common approaches to look at trends in extreme rainfall and suggested that from a practical risk management point of view it is more useful to concentrate on the identification of the trends, rather than proving their existence from past observations. Various statistical tools allow to incorporate non-stationarities after detecting trends through model selection, either through traditional Extreme Value Theory (EVT) or leveraging the information in the full distribution through the MEV approach. The central insight of the MEV approach and the trend analysis more in general is that changes in moderate rainfall can inform us about changes in extremes. If the body of the distribution (e.g., 10–50 mm daily events for the example of Asheville) is intensifying, then the upper tail (e.g., >100 mm) is likely doing so as well—even if data scarcity masks it.

The ability to identify and quantify trends allows decision makers to act on clearer, more stable signals rather than waiting for rare extreme events to show statistically significant changes. In practice, the most valuable question is not ‘Was there a trend in the past?’ but ‘What might happen in the future?’ Looming in the background remain the limitations of statistical methods when it comes to extrapolating to unseen extremes (epistemic uncertainty); therefore, it is important to invest in reducing these uncertainties as much as possible by leveraging methods that are informed by the physical processes to complement the statistical analysis.

Contributors

Tyler Cox PhD
Tyler Cox PhD
Ludovico Nicotina PhD
Ludovico Nicotina PhD
Patrick Ball PhD
Patrick Ball PhD
Ruth Petrie PhD
Ruth Petrie PhD

News

Rainfall Extremes in a Changing Climate: Detecting Change and Improving Predictions 

Key Points Last week I was in Vienna at the annual meeting of the European Geoscience Union (EGU), a large gathering of the wider international...

Chasing ‘Blockbuster’ Status: The Impact on Securities Class Actions

Inigo’s 2025 Seasonal Hurricane Outlook